I struggle with judgmentalism. Here's what it looks like in my life:
1. I regard some sins as worse than others. I can be really forgiving of the things that plague me and really harsh toward those sins I do not struggle with.
2. I overlook sins in my own life and emphasize the salient in others. I've never thought of myself as greedy. Of the sins that I condemn quickly, greed is probably at the top of the list. But, I'm also guilty of being a poor money manager. I'm guilty of technolust (wanting the newest gadget without determining whether it's useful or not) and I buy too much on impulse. Gluttony is another form of greed and I'm guilty of it. I easily overlook these sins in my own life but quickly judge the greedy people "on Wall Street."
3. I relish an attitude of moral superiority rather than earnestly praying for repentance.
4. I am slow to believe people's intentions to change even though I profess a belief in the power of grace to transform.
Thursday, July 18, 2013
When a Minister Manages a Building
We have had so many building repairs. In my office, I have an orange notebook. The staff and I are using it manage several different projects related to the building: adding access control and security to the major entrances, changing 10 air conditioning units, getting the roof repaired, repaving the parking lot, upgrading our internet service and installing wifi through the center section of the building, replacing the gravel in the playground with playground mulch.
I have zero building management experience. The fact that building management has been such a low priority for me until this year is part of what has forced me to think about it now. I am by no means claiming expertise. I feel more ignorant about physical plants now than at the beginning of the year. But, I thought I should record a few of my preliminary observations about what happens when a minister manages a building (or when this minister manages this building):
1. Nothing in his ministry training or experience is helpful here.
2. Having "another set of eyes and ears" on a problem means managing another set of opinions.
3. When a contractor thinks that he is your only option, he will charge you more. I'm grateful to Troy Singleton for the line--you can sheer a sheep many times but you can only skin them once.
4. Vendors can be some of the most emotionally temperamental people you'll deal with in a week--and that's saying a lot for a minister.
5. If I preached sermons the way some of these guys run their businesses, I wouldn't be able to serve a church anywhere.
I have zero building management experience. The fact that building management has been such a low priority for me until this year is part of what has forced me to think about it now. I am by no means claiming expertise. I feel more ignorant about physical plants now than at the beginning of the year. But, I thought I should record a few of my preliminary observations about what happens when a minister manages a building (or when this minister manages this building):
1. Nothing in his ministry training or experience is helpful here.
2. Having "another set of eyes and ears" on a problem means managing another set of opinions.
3. When a contractor thinks that he is your only option, he will charge you more. I'm grateful to Troy Singleton for the line--you can sheer a sheep many times but you can only skin them once.
4. Vendors can be some of the most emotionally temperamental people you'll deal with in a week--and that's saying a lot for a minister.
5. If I preached sermons the way some of these guys run their businesses, I wouldn't be able to serve a church anywhere.
Monday, July 15, 2013
Civility in conflict
Sometimes a movement's worst enemies are its most ardent supports who, out of zeal for their cause, make victims of their opponents and therefore make their opponents heroes. Christians of the first three centuries faced intermittent experiences of persecution. The persecutions did not have the intended result. In fact, they had quite the opposite effect. Christianity grew in popularity even as its leaders were thrown out of the synagogues by religious leaders or thrown to lions by political leaders. Tertullian addressed early Christianity's persecutors once by saying, "The more often we are mown down by you, the more in number we grow. The blood of Christians is seed." This lesson from history is often lost in today's conversations around questions of religion and politics.
Today, we create labels for the people who disagree with us. We are too easily convinced that a person’s whole character can be reduced to those labels we place on them. We will take one issue and make assumptions about the person’s whole character based on that one position on a single issue. Frequently, we are guilty of not even completely understanding what that person believes about that one issue. Certain topics like “abortion,” “patriotism,” “gun control,” or “equal protection” trigger emotional responses that get in the way of genuine dialogue. We may not execute or excommunicate our opponents. We may use condemnations, logical fallacies, sarcasm, condescension, histrionics, sneering satire, labeling, assumptions and shouting as tools we to silence people. Yet, today’s tools are as ineffective as their more violent predecessors.
I find that on most issues, I’m hopelessly moderate. If I have a passion it is a passion that people learn engage conflict hospitably. We should assume that people who disagree with us are not bad. We should limit the assumptions we make about people. We should let people define themselves on their own terms. We should limit the amount of labeling, name-calling or generalizing we do. And we should value the opportunity to be in conversation with those who disagree with us. As I say this, I’m very aware of the times that I have failed to follow my own advice. Which means I should ask for one thing more—we should show grace when people speak to divisively or angrily in an initial way. Grace means everyone gets a second chance including those who try to deny that chance to others. Today’s hotheads can also repent and their repentance should be trusted.
Listening is not the same thing as agreeing. But listening is usually the first step in the journey of mutual growth and understanding. Christians who have strong opinions about social issues need to stop and ask themselves if they want to win a war of words or participate in real and lasting change. Winning the war of words is easy. Find a label that sticks and tell a joke that stings and you win! Change is much more difficult. But Christ has not called us to be winners in a war of words but citizens in a kingdom governed by love. This includes loving our enemies—loving our opponents.
Today, we create labels for the people who disagree with us. We are too easily convinced that a person’s whole character can be reduced to those labels we place on them. We will take one issue and make assumptions about the person’s whole character based on that one position on a single issue. Frequently, we are guilty of not even completely understanding what that person believes about that one issue. Certain topics like “abortion,” “patriotism,” “gun control,” or “equal protection” trigger emotional responses that get in the way of genuine dialogue. We may not execute or excommunicate our opponents. We may use condemnations, logical fallacies, sarcasm, condescension, histrionics, sneering satire, labeling, assumptions and shouting as tools we to silence people. Yet, today’s tools are as ineffective as their more violent predecessors.
I find that on most issues, I’m hopelessly moderate. If I have a passion it is a passion that people learn engage conflict hospitably. We should assume that people who disagree with us are not bad. We should limit the assumptions we make about people. We should let people define themselves on their own terms. We should limit the amount of labeling, name-calling or generalizing we do. And we should value the opportunity to be in conversation with those who disagree with us. As I say this, I’m very aware of the times that I have failed to follow my own advice. Which means I should ask for one thing more—we should show grace when people speak to divisively or angrily in an initial way. Grace means everyone gets a second chance including those who try to deny that chance to others. Today’s hotheads can also repent and their repentance should be trusted.
Listening is not the same thing as agreeing. But listening is usually the first step in the journey of mutual growth and understanding. Christians who have strong opinions about social issues need to stop and ask themselves if they want to win a war of words or participate in real and lasting change. Winning the war of words is easy. Find a label that sticks and tell a joke that stings and you win! Change is much more difficult. But Christ has not called us to be winners in a war of words but citizens in a kingdom governed by love. This includes loving our enemies—loving our opponents.
Monday, July 01, 2013
Gettysburg Revisited
This
week marks the 150th Anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg—a
turning point battle in the Civil War.
The battle was a three day ordeal.
In total, 51,000 soldiers, Union and Confederate, died at the
battle. It was started somewhat by
accident as Union soldiers encountered Confederate soldiers at a crossroads
outside a small Pennsylvania town.
General Robert E. Lee convinced the Confederate leadership to try once
again to shift the battles to the North by shifting troops beyond the Mason-Dixon
Line. Considered to be one of the finest
generals America has ever produced, Robert E. Lee made a few fatal mistakes at
Gettysburg that changed the shape of the war.
Unfortunately, his counter-part General Meade also made the mistake of
not taking advantage of the victory and allowing the Confederate Army to
retreat. That decision meant that
America’s bloodiest war would continue for another year and a half.
In
November of 1863, President Abraham Lincoln came to Gettysburg to dedicate a
cemetery. The speech he delivered, the
so-called Gettysburg Address, is one of the most familiar pieces of American
public discourse. In a touch of
unplanned irony, Lincoln said, “The world will little note, nor long remember
what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.” Truth be told the world is more familiar with
what he said that day than what they did.
We could lament this fact but, I think it is significant.
The
Gettysburg Address framed the reason for the war in moral and ethical
terms. The nation began with a
premise—God desires people to live free.
Lincoln essentially said that the whole of democracy hinged on the
outcome of the war. Could people live
both free and united? It remains a
difficult proposition. Freedom without
unity is easy. Chaotic and cruel but
easy. Unity without freedom is also
easy. It’s despotic and lifeless but
easy. Freedom and unity together
requires patience, forgiveness, and reconciliation. Today we continue to struggle with whether we
as a people can allow people to say what they want, live the way they want,
worship and think the way the want and still be held together as an indivisible
people. As Christians, we have been
invested in this struggle for well over 150 years. It was the most significant challenge faced
by the early church. Early Christians
pushed against ever seam of culture, language, philosophy and lifestyle to see
if this movement could live up to Jesus’s prayer, “that they might all be one”
(John 17). We continue that struggle
today. May God give us strength.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)